|
| ▲ | justcool393 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| why wouldn't you? these are easily compressible text files. storing even like 100x into a 400 day (at most, the default for GH is 90) box is downright cheap to do on even massive scales. it's 2025, for log files and a spicy cron daemon (you pay for the artifact storage), it's practically free to do so. this isn't like the days of Western Union where paying $0.35 to send some data across the world is a good deal |
| |
| ▲ | gaigalas 6 days ago | parent [-] | | If that's the case, why all the fuzz? All the people complaining can just tap into this almost-free and acessible cheap resource you are referring to instead. | | |
| ▲ | falsedan 5 days ago | parent [-] | | we don't need it. we need to run our CI jobs on resources we manage ourselves, and GitHub have started charging per-minute for it. apples and cannonballs |
|
|
|
| ▲ | falsedan 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| no, I'd cut the monthly seat cost and grow my user base to include more low-volume devs but realistically, publishing a web page is practically free. you could be sending 100x as much data and I would still be laughing all the way to the bank |
| |
| ▲ | gaigalas 6 days ago | parent [-] | | Publishing the page is only the last step. It's orchestrating the stuff THEN publishing it. If you think that's easy, do it for me. I have some projects to migrate, give me the link of your service. | | |
| ▲ | falsedan 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > If you think that's easy I think it's cheap to maintain. let me know how many devs you have, how many runs you do, and how many tests (by suite) you have, and I can do you up a quote for hosting some Allure reports. can spread the up-front costs over the 3-year monthly commitment if it helps | |
| ▲ | janc_ 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are several services I know who offer this for free for open source software, and I really doubt any commercial offerings of that software would charge you extra for what is basic API usage. |
|
|
