Remix.run Logo
andsens 6 days ago

That's not a move of a company that thinks it can still grow. That's a Netflix "we have 90% of the market, let's squeeze them" move. This is the beginning. We have all seen this pattern over the last 5+ years. You know their next few moves.

groundzeros2015 6 days ago | parent [-]

The Netflix one worked

qoez 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Worked for them not for the consumers

Izikiel43 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Netflix is looking out for Netflix shareholders, not for consumers, like any other public company.

azemetre 6 days ago | parent [-]

Perfectly good excuse to make society worse for people. Oh wait, what's that? It's not a good excuse? Oh okay.

almostgotcaught 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Perfectly good excuse to make society worse for people

What an incredibly silly accusation to make of a company/service that streams movies and television. Like you understand it is possible to dilute the concept of civic responsibility right?

groundzeros2015 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nobody needs a Netflix subscription. You can just stop paying

Izikiel43 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

?

Companies don't care about society, unless it affects profit. Companies are not people, they are cold machines that through different means try to reach the same purpose, make more money.

No one should anthropomorphize companies. They might look like they have human qualities, same way like the T800 in the Terminator looked human.

praveenperera 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

short-term maybe, but piracy is making a come back

jmkni 6 days ago | parent [-]

It never left

array_key_first 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

It actually kind of did for a lot of people. Streaming was cheap, available, and convenient.

Now it's none of those three. Once again, choosing not to pirate is just an objectively wrong choice. It's a worse experience, with worse quality, worse availability, and at a higher price tag.

molave 6 days ago | parent [-]

> Choosing not to pirate is just an objectively wrong choice. It's a worse experience, with worse quality, worse availability, and at a higher price tag.

Choosing not to pirate and not to consume simultaneously is not necessarily a wrong choice. A difficult one? Yes. But I propose that it could be beneficial for your mental (and maybe physical) health.

array_key_first 6 days ago | parent [-]

This is the approach I took with most things, so you're right. But still, TV can be some of the highest quality and engaging media you can find. I mean, it's not short form slop or thinly veiled advertisment... If you look in the right places.

donatj 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I went almost 20 years without sailing the high seas. It was the death of DVD Netflix that really did it for me.

With DVD, Netflix if something I wanted to watch wasn't on any of my streaming services, it was almost guaranteed to be on DVD Netflix. That fallback doesn't exist anymore.

estimator7292 6 days ago | parent [-]

Yeah, once I grew up and started making money, I quit pirating. Just didn't have a need for it anymore.

But when streaming started to really go down the toilet I already had a homelab so I spun up radarr and Jellyfin behind seven proxies for family-scale piracy. It's wonderful. This is a new golden age for piracy.

vkou 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It worked to push me to unsubscribe.

rssoconnor 6 days ago | parent [-]

I also unsubscribed, but even with you and me out, from what I read, it was a profitable move on Netflix's part. I guess I can't fault them.

bean469 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The Netflix one worked

Did it, though? User frustration seems to be growing, people are already seeking out alternatives

luma 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The first stages always do, that's why corporations keep pulling the enshittification lever.