| ▲ | 4gotunameagain 6 days ago |
| Oh yes, totally worth it to risk THE FREE INTERNET because of that. |
|
| ▲ | philipwhiuk 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| He's not defending "THE FREE INTERNET" at his new place. (Which for the record, is less important than physical freedom). |
| |
| ▲ | LunaSea 6 days ago | parent [-] | | Maybe that has to do with Brave not getting a free check to the tune iof $500M Google every year. That makes it more difficult to create "free internet" type projects. | | |
| ▲ | Orygin 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Probably comes from the Crypto scam integrated into the browser. I find it funny some people shit on Firefox for adding Pocket, but defend Brave for adding crypto scams to the browser. | | |
| ▲ | LunaSea 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't defend Brave adding this feature or believe that it is even a good idea but how does this constitute a scam? | | |
| ▲ | Orygin 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > I don't defend Brave Maybe not, but you spend quite some time spitting on Mozilla for taking money from Google. | | |
| ▲ | LunaSea 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, because (1) they spent that money badly as can be seen from the non-Google revenue numbers of Mozilla and Firefox's market share and (2) people are comparing practices of a company that gets $500M for free and a practices of a company that is essentially bootstrapped, which makes no sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | joshstrange 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > risk THE FREE INTERNET because of that Come off it, as if he is the only one who can save us. Spare me. |
