| ▲ | davedx 17 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I think the point is, yes, cooling is a significant engineering challenge in space; but having easy access to abundant energy (solar) and not needing to navigate difficult politically charged permitting processes makes it worthwhile. It's a big set of trade offs, and to only focus on "cooling being very hard in space" is kind of missing the point of why these companies want to do this. Compute is severely power-constrained everywhere except China, and space based datacenters is a way to get around that. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 13 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Of course you can build these things if you really want to. But there is no universe in which it's possible to build them economically. Not even close. The numbers are simply ridiculous. And that's not even accounting for the fact that getting even one of these things into orbit is an absolutely huge R&D project that will take years - by which time technology and requirements will have moved on. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||