| ▲ | drnick1 21 hours ago | |
The C++ devs at your firm must be absolutely terrible if a newcomer using a scripting language can write faster software, or you are not telling the whole story. All of NumPy, Julia, MATLAB, R, and similar domain-specific, user-friendly libraries and platforms use BLAS and LAPACK for numerical calculations under the hood with some overhead depending on the implementation, so a reasonably optimized native implementation should always be faster. By the looks of it the C++ code wasn't compiled with -O3 if it can be trivially beaten by Julia. | ||
| ▲ | SatvikBeri 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Are you aware that Julia is a compiled language with a heavy focus on performance? It is not in the same category as NumPy/MATLAB/R | ||
| ▲ | postflopclarity 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Julia is not a scripting language and can match C performance on many tasks. | ||