Beautiful UI.

What's the criteria for pieces promoted?

Same here. I'm really curious about this too. What do they mean by "wonderful"? I suppose some of the pieces here might not be very well-known or popular, but they are inspiring, or maybe they are a good resource for learning something. All I can see is they are maybe associated with a read-later app?

▲

mentalfist a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At a quick glance, the main criteria seems for it to be libertarian and anti-socialism.

	▲	snorbleck a day ago \| parent [-]
		not quite. it's random selections every visit to the site.

▲

photios a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Wondering about that too. What are the "wonderfullness" criteria?

For example, the first article I clicked on: https://juliagalef.com/2017/08/23/unpopular-ideas-about-soci...

has some pretty vile stuff:

> Non-offending pedophiles should be more widely accepted by society. It’s unfair to ostracize someone for a desire they were born with, and integrating them into society makes them less likely to cause harm.

▲

sambapa a day ago | parent [-]

Whats vile about that?

▲

IAmBroom a day ago | parent | next [-]

Amorality.

There's no evidence that anyone is born with particular sexual deviations. It attempts to simultaneously absolve and normalize attitudes that ideate rape of children, so long as they don't act on it. That's a pretty thin and permeable line to draw.

	▲	efilife 19 hours ago \| parent [-]
		were you born with an attraction to women or is there no evidence to support it?

▲

efilife a day ago | parent | prev [-]

The truth