| ▲ | culi a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tuples, `&` operator, and even generics all work perfectly well inside a `@type` declaration. For example: ```js
is the exact equivalent of```ts
For TS-specific keywords like `satisfies`, there's a corresponding JSDoc keyword like @satisfies. Generics use @template.Is there any specific feature you think is not supported? I'm sure I could work up a TS Playground example. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | c-hendricks a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Is there any specific feature you think is not supported Yeah, uhm, most of what you've been posting? :). That JSDoc example above gives:
Edit: Also, your first edit says Webpack switched from TypeScript to JavaScript, but Webpack source was never written in TypeScript. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||