Hi Kasper, good to see you here! Thank you for the detailed feedback.

1. Yes we got over-excited with the agent runtime use case. We stand by the LLM implementation because we never compromised on the integrity of Dagger's modular design. But our marketing and product priorities were all over the place. We're going to refocus on the original use case: helping you ship software, and more particularly building & testing it.

2. Modules have warts but they are essential. We will continue to improve them, and remain committed to them. Without this feature, you have to write a complete standalone program every time you want to build or test your software. It's too much overhead.

3. Yes you are right. We really thought we could co-exist with CI runners, and get good performance without reinventing the wheel. But for various reasons that turned out to not be the case. So we're going to ship vertically integrated runners, with excellent scalability and performance. DM me if you want early access :)

TLDR: yes we needed to choose and execute. We have, and we are.

Thank you again for the feedback.

Sounds good Solomon I look forward to seeing how it goes in about a year when I am going to tackle our CI again ;)

Best of luck and thx for taking my harsh feedback in strides!