Thanks for mentioning this. I always find it unsettling when I've researched solutions for something and only find a better option from a random HN comment.

Site: https://kubb.dev/

▲

WickyNilliams a day ago | parent | next [-]

Fwiw I tried every tool imaginable a few years ago including kubb, (which I think I contributed to while testing things out)

The only mature, correct, fast option with a fixed cost (since it mostly exists at the type level meaning it doesn't scale your bundle with your API) was openapi-ts. I am not affiliated other than a previous happy user, though I did make some PRs while using it https://openapi-ts.dev/

▲

bakugo a day ago | parent | prev [-]

This project seems to be mostly AI generated, so keep that in mind before replacing any existing solutions.

▲

0x696C6961 a day ago | parent [-]

No it doesn't

▲

bakugo a day ago | parent [-]

Did you see the repo?

https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb

Most of the commits and pull requests are AI. Issues are also seemingly being handled by AI with minimal human intervention.

▲

komali2 a day ago | parent | next [-]

I've had a PR on Kubb that was taken over by a human maintainer. They then closed my PR and reimplemented my fix in their own PR.

So, the project is human enough to annoy me, anyway.

▲

JAlexoid a day ago | parent | prev [-]

AI assisted, not necessarily generated.

And yes, current models are amazing at reducing time it takes to push out a feature or fix a bug. I wouldn't even consider working at a company that banned use of AI to help me write code.

PS: It's also irrelevant to whether it's AI generated or not, what matters is if it works and is secure.

▲

bakugo a day ago | parent [-]

> what matters is if it works and is secure.

How do you know it works and is secure if a lot of the code likely hasn't ever been read and understood by a human?

	▲	JAlexoid a day ago \| parent [-]
		There are literally users here that say that it works. And you presume that the code hasn't been read or understood by a human. AI doesn't click merge on a PR, so it's highly likely that the code has been read by a human.