You can't. So don't advertise it as free. It's just lying, simple as that. People either pay with their data, their attention or their money.

Companies should be required to be transparent about how much revenue each of these sources generates.

"You can't. So don't advertise it as free. It's just lying"

its free as you paid zero dollar

"People either pay with their data, their attention or their money."

for some people money is more important than their data, and its vice versa with wealthy customer

I agree that in the future maybe we can control how much data/money we can paid for the service but that just not possible in current time

> its free as you paid zero dollar

What about other currencies? Do you only count state-issues currencies? Have you heard about barter?

> but that just not possible in current time

Why not?

"What about other currencies? Do you only count state-issues currencies?"

well you convert them to usd

"Have you heard about barter?"

well you are free to choose paid service that else where, I dont understand this coming from. no one force you to choose free product

	▲	martin-t 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The point is it's not free, you're exchanging time, attention and data instead of money. In fact, you're exchanging them at a rate you are not informed about which means you are disadvantaged in this exchange. It would be free if for example there were 2 tiers, free and paid and the free tier would be entirely supported by the paying customers. But it's not. This is another way companies can legally lie to customers. I honestly don't understand why you keep defending them.