| |
| ▲ | callc a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Any metric that measures the amount of software delivered. The link at the bottom of the post (https://mikelovesrobots.substack.com/p/wheres-the-shovelware...) goes over this exactly. > Businesses, on the other hand, announce headcount reductions due to AI and of course nobody believes them. It’s an excuse. It’s the dream peddled by AI companies: automate intelligence so you can fire your human workers. Look at the graphs in the post, then revisit claims about AI productivity. The data doesn’t lie. AI peddlers do. | | |
| ▲ | ogogmad a day ago | parent [-] | | Given the amount of progress in AI coding in the last 3 years, are you seriously confident that AI won't increase programming productivity in the next three? This reminds me of the people who said that we shouldn't raise the alarm when only a few hundred people in this country (the UK) got Covid. What's a few hundred people? A few weeks later, everyone knew somebody who did. | | |
| ▲ | rsynnott a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Okay, so if and when that happens, get excited about it _then_? Re the Covid metaphor; that only works because Covid was the pandemic that did break out. It is arguably the first one in a century to do so. Most putative pandemics actually come to very little (see SARS1, various candidate pandemic flus, the mpox outbreak, various Ebola outbreaks, and so on). Not to say we shouldn’t be alarmed by them, of course, but “one thing really blew up, therefore all things will blow up” isn’t a reasonable thought process. | |
| ▲ | wizzwizz4 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | AI codegen isn't comparable to a highly-infectious disease: it's been a lot more than a few weeks. I don't think your analogy is apt: it reads more like rhetoric to me. (Unless I've missed the point entirely.) | | |
| ▲ | anorwell a day ago | parent [-] | | https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-com... From my perspective, it's not the worst analogy. In both cases, some people were forecasting an exponential trend into the future and sounding an alarm, while most people seemed to be discounting the exponential effect. Covid's doubling time was ~3 days, whereas the AI capabilities doubling time seems to be about 7 months. I think disagreement in threads like this often can trace back to a miscommunication about the state today / historically versus. Skeptics are usually saying: capabilities are not good _today_ (or worse: capabilities were not good six months ago when I last tested it. See: this OP which is pre-Opus 4.5). Capabilities forecasters are saying: given the trend, what will things be like in 2026-2027? | | |
| ▲ | wizzwizz4 a day ago | parent [-] | | The "COVID-19's doubling time was ≈3 days" figure was the output of an epidemiological model, based on solid and empirically-validated theory, based on hundreds of years of observations of diseases. "AI capabilities' doubling time seems to be about 7 months" is based on meaningless benchmarks, corporate marketing copy, and subjective reports contradicted by observational evidence of the same events. There's no compelling reason to believe that any of this is real, and plenty of reason to believe it's largely fraudulent. (Models from 2, 3, 4 years ago based on the "it's fraud" concept are still showing high predictive power today, whereas the models of the "capabilities forecasters" have been repeatedly adjusted.) |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | bccdee a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The article provides a few good signals: (1) an increase in the rate at which apps are added to the app store, and (2) reports of companies forgoing large SaaS dependencies and just building them themselves. If software is truly a commodity, why aren't people making their own Jiras and Figmas and Salesforces? If we can really vibe something production-ready in no time, why aren't industry-standard tools being replaced by custom vibe clones? | | |
| ▲ | thunky a day ago | parent [-] | | > If we can really vibe something production-ready in no time, why aren't industry-standard tools being replaced by custom vibe clones? That's a silly argument. Someone could have made all of those clones before, but didn't. Why didn't they? Hint: it's not because it would have taken them longer without AI. I feel like these anti-AI arguments are intentially being unrealistic. Just because I can use Nano Banana to create art does not mean I'm going to be the next Monet. | | |
| ▲ | bccdee a day ago | parent [-] | | > Why didn't they? Hint: it's not because it would have taken them longer without AI. Yes it is. "How much will this cost us to build" is a key component of the build-vs-buy decision. If you build it yourself, you get something tailored to your needs; however, it also costs money to make & maintain. If the cost of making & maintaining software went down, we'd see people choosing more frequently to build rather than buy. Are we seeing this? If not, then the price of producing reliable, production-ready software likely has not significantly diminished. I see a lot of posts saying, "I vibe-coded this toy prototype in one week! Software is a commodity now," but I don't see any engineers saying, "here's how we vibe-coded this piece of production-quality software in one month, when it would have taken us a year to build it before." It seems to me like the only software whose production has been significantly accelerated is toy prototypes. I assume it's a consequence of Amdahl's law: > the overall performance improvement gained by optimizing a single part of a system is limited by the fraction of time that the improved part is actually used. Toy prototypes proportionally contains a much higher amount of the type of rote greenfield scaffolding that agents are good at writing. The sticker problems of brownfield growth and robustification are absent. |
|
| |
| ▲ | garden_hermit a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I would expect a general rise in productivity across sectors, but with the largest concentrated in the tech sector given the focus on code generation. A proliferation of new apps, new features, and new functionalities at a quicker pace than pre-AI. Given the hype, one would expect an inflection point in the productivity of this sector, but it mostly just appears linear. I am very willing to believe that there are many obscure and low-quality apps being generated by AI. But this speaks to the fact that mere generation of code is not productive, that generating quality applications requires other forms of labor that is not presently satisfied by generative AI. | | |
| ▲ | thunky a day ago | parent [-] | | > A proliferation of new apps, new features, and new functionalities at a quicker pace than pre-AI IMO you're not seeing this because nobody is coming up with good ideas because we're already saturated with apps. And apps are already releasing features faster than anyone wants them. How many app reviews have you read that say: "Was great before the last update". Development speed and ability isn't the thing holding us back from great software releases. |
| |
| ▲ | rsynnott a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I would expect a _big_ increase in the production of amateur/hobbyist games. These aren’t demand driven; they’re basically passion projects generally. And that doesn’t seem to be happening; steam releases are actually modestly _down_, say. | | |
|
| Its not productivity boosting in a sense of "you can leave 2h earlier", but in a sense of "you get more done faster", resulting in more stuff created. Thats my general assumption/approach for "using AI to code". When it comes to "AI-generated apps" that work out of the box, I do not believe in them - I think for creating a "complete" app, the tools are not good enough (yet?). Context & co is required, esp. for larger apps and to connect the building blocks - I do not think there will be any remarkable apps coming out of such a process. I see the AI tools just as a junior developer who will create datastructures, functions, etc. when I instruct it to do so: It attends in code creation & optimization, but not in "complete app architecture" (maybe as sparring partner) |
