I think the blog post is confusing in this regard. For example, it explicitly states:

> We no longer had to deploy 140+ services for a change to one of the shared libraries.

Taken in isolation, that is a strong indicator that they were indeed running a distributed monolith.

However, the blog post earlier on said that different microservices were using different versions of the library. If that was actually true, then they would never have to deploy all 140+ of their services in response to a single change in their shared library.

▲ lukevp 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Shared telemetry library, you realize that you are missing an important metric to operationalize your services. You now need to deploy all 140 to get the benefit.

Your runtime version is out of date / end of life. You now need to update and deploy all 140 (or at least all the ones that use the same tech stack).

No matter how you slice it, there are always dependencies across all services because there are standards in the environment in which they operate, and there are always going to be situations where you have to redeploy everything or large swaths of things.

Microservices aren’t a panacea. They just let you delay the inevitable but there is gonna be a point where you’re forced to comply with a standard somewhere that changes in a way that services must be updated. A lot of teams use shared libraries for this functionality.

▲

jrnng 6 hours ago | parent [-]

These are great examples. I'll add one more. Object names and metadata definitions. Figuring out what the official name for something is across systems, where to define the source of truth, and who maintains it.

	▲	procaryote 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Why do all services need to understand all these objects though? A service should as far as possible care about its own things and treat other services' objects as opaque. ... otherwise you'd have to do something silly like update every service every time that library changed.

▲ necovek 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As you mention, it said early on that they were using different versions for each service:

  > Eventually, all of them were using different versions of these shared libraries.

I believe the need to deploy 140+ services came out of wanting to fix this by using the latest version of the deps everywhere, and to then stay on top of it so it does not deteriorate in the same way (and possibly when they had things like a security fix).

▲ raphinou 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Except if it's a security fix?