| ▲ | quickthrowman 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
You didn’t pick particularly good examples. YouTube Kids [0] is an actual product owned and marketed by Google. Pfizer and Anheiser-Busch don’t market their products to kids. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gregates 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
And the reason is that those products are (rightly) regulated. Would there be beer marketed to kids if it were legal? Would it be fine if it were the parents' sole responsibility to ensure their kids weren't drinking beer, including at school, at friends' homes where the parents may have different rules, etc., absent a general social consensus that kids shouldn't have beer? This is anecdotal evidence for the emerging consensus that social media is bad for you and especially for kids. There's a legitimate question whether the people pushing these products know this and don't care or actively suppress evidence. Tobacco companies famously did this and it caused a lot of harm. It's about that more than just a chance for a cheap shot "hypocrisy" accusation. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||