| ▲ | zelphirkalt 3 days ago |
| I am not depending on cloud storage at all. What do I need to upload onto some cloud? And when I need to sync between devices, or rather want to sync, then I have a Syncthing setup on my server running. No cloud. And copies on participating devices. Sure, it is not directly their fault, when they are treated badly by big tech. Though of course they could have been more careful, and rely less on big tech and cloud. We can all learn from this example, like many others before this one. |
|
| ▲ | tonymet 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| How do you collaborate ? Do you have friends ? A job ? I’m not being rhetorical —- it’s very rare to have friends or a job and not have some ties to the cloud. Even my tiny HOA manages its record in the cloud |
| |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > How do you collaborate ? I commit code. I pair program. I share screen. That sort of thing. Code is mostly set up to have reproducible results. If it is not working on the other machine, then that's a bug and we need to solve it. There is not much collaboration I need to be doing in my free time. What I did on the last job is not what I depend on, but what a business thought they depend on. That's their stuff. If it fails because of some cloud ban or outage, not my problem. When I need to share files with friends, I send them the files. Or I use Copyparty. Or, if they are more technically minded, I use Syncthing. For not so technical friends, I don't have to share 10k photos at once. Maybe I will send them a few photos via a messenger. Or some files they need via a messenger or have them on Copyparty, if needed often or again in the future. There is no issue. > Do you have friends ? Yes. > A job ? Had, and probably soon will have again, but I don't know what that has to do with what I depend on. If my job prescribes some cloud usage that is unnecessary, I guess I can try and show an alternative and begrudgingly accept that I have to use shitty tooling. But if somehow it is made impossible for me to use that, then it is their job to find an alternative. I am never the one prescribing it, and I myself don't depend on cloud. > I’m not being rhetorical —- it’s very rare to have friends or a job and not have some ties to the cloud. Even my tiny HOA manages its record in the cloud I surely have friends, who probably use some MS or Google cloud stuff. But that's their problem, not mine. I don't depend on that. And they don't share that much stuff with me, that there is sufficient incentive to start depending on it. And if they did, I would tell them, that I don't want to make a shitty account on MS or Google cloud storage thingies. | | |
| ▲ | tonymet 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I can’t tell if this is disingenuous. How do you plan an event like a wedding , moving, a project with your friends without using cloud apps? And surely one of your employers had you use Onedrive / Google Drive / Dropbox etc. If you really do all those things without cloud, are you just using email for everything? How do you keep the docs in sync ? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | EvanAnderson 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Presumably, as the GP said, you're not a normal person and you live in a basement. >sigh< (I'm with a lot of what the GP said but they didn't need to be insulting.) The solutions self-hosting storage for non-technical people are terrible. Presumably there's no market for selling a solution that gives individuals data sovereignty. I would guess the margin isn't there and a recurring subscription for something you own is probably unpalatable to a lot of consumers. So this is what we get. |
| |
| ▲ | rvnx 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The main side-effect is the lack of trust and integration. For example, if you self-host your email (or more realistically push it on a VPS), then the moment you want to send an e-mail you are going to be marked as spam. To register on some websites you may sometimes receive: “please use real email from gmail/outlook/etc”. When you have a business meeting with a customer: “oh just install Jitsi on your mobile phone” is the best way to lose a sale. Or no way to pay train tickets because you cannot install the app because your Apple / Play Store account is locked. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I get what you are saying, but the examples are not great: I've rarely seen (if ever?) a website so stupid and user hostile, to claim that there are no other "real" e-mail service providers out there, other than gmail, outlook, or a maybe a few others. There are services, which reject things like tempmail, that much I have seen, definitely. Jitsi Meet runs in the browser. Does it not on a mobile phone? Perhaps there is something to this one, if it is the case, that customers in some areas don't even own any working machines any longer and only have phones. Train tickets, at least where I am from and living, one can always buy, by going to a service center, or online via browser. I never had to use an app to buy train tickets. Even when traveling in China, which is arguably much further in terms of digitization than Germany, I was able to buy train tickets via a website comfortably, upon which the ticket was registered to my passport. But I get it, there can be such examples. Though I don't think this really matches the "depend on the cloud" thing. It's more like depending on services, that make use of "the cloud", and not directly using cloud services oneself. | | |
| ▲ | rvnx 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I agree with you, and I think your reasoning is totally understandable. Just that I see additional friction, and friction in a business world is risk :/ (side-note, with Jitsi, it feels like I have a fireplace log in the hands when I use it) I think Samsung rejected non-"Big Emails", but pretty sure we can find exceptions both ways. Fun stuff I found while searching:
> https://transportation.ucsc.edu/buses-shuttles/dvs/
>
> The Disability Van Service (DVS) is a shared-ride service that provides on-campus wheelchair ramp–equipped transportation for those unable to use the regular Campus Transit system due to disability
>
> If you are a visitor, please use a Gmail address to complete the form or email dvs@ucsc.edu if that is not possible and then, the form is behind... a Google login wall | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > and then, the form is behind... a Google login wall Ugh. The people making that should really be informed about the issues they are causing with this. They probably are just uninformed and want to offer a good service, but actually are forcing people to give up personal data to Google, which is a big no-go. This is what happens when digital rights and privacy unaware people are in charge of something like this. | | |
| ▲ | Barbing 2 days ago | parent [-] | | :( Google forces signin when the form creator adds upload fields on Google Forms… real simple service but huge privacy downsides for sure. They “got it done” w/o much technical knowledge, but at a cost. |
|
| |
| ▲ | EvanAnderson 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Concert and theatre venues in the US, mostly locked into exclusive agreements with Ticketmaster, practically require a smartphone running the Ticketmaster app. You can load the tickets into the Apple and Google "wallet" apps but you have to have the Ticketmaster app to do that. In the past year I've had to pretend to be a confused elderly person and beg box offices to get me printed tickets because I don't want to load the Ticketmaster app. Eventually I'll have to buy a burner device, assuming I still want to attend live events. | | |
| ▲ | rvnx 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Ah, perfect! One question: is Ticketmaster rejecting non-"Big email providers" ? I suspect they do, due to bots (wouldn't it be the same with Tinder, etc ?) | | |
| ▲ | EvanAnderson 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't know. My Ticketmaster account was created in August, 2005, and is a one-off email address at my personal domain. I have no idea if I could create an account like that today (and I'd be afraid to try). |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | vachina 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > there's no market for selling a solution that gives individuals data sovereignty Theres no turnkey solution (of course not, it is prohibitively complex to architect one), but the bits and pieces are there, built on tried and tested software. For example, SMB and rsync and their clients, are practically enough to do backups. | |
| ▲ | crapple8430 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sovereignty also means responsibility. Either you have to keep your network secure, or you pay someone else do it (not always very well), otherwise you get security problems. Same goes for redundants backups, hardware maintenance, etc. |
|
|
| ▲ | rambojohnson 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |