What kind of founding ethos doesn't allow tracking internal latency? Is their founding ethos "Never Admit Responsibility?"; "Never Leave A Paper Trail?"

This company's official ethical foundation is "Don't Get Caught."

▲

WJW 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

From the wiki about IEX: "It was founded in 2012 in order to mitigate the effects of high-frequency trading." I can see how they don't want to track internal latency as part of that, or at least not share those numbers with outsiders. That just encourages high frequency traders again.

▲

pants2 3 days ago | parent [-]

One would hope for a more technical solution to HFT than willful ignorance lol. For example, they could batch up orders every second and randomize them.

▲

atomicnumber3 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I worked in HFT. (Though am now completely out of fintech and have no skin in the game). "Flash Boys" traditional HFT is dead already, the trade collapsed in 2016-2018 when both larger institutions got less dumb with order execution, and also several HFTs "switched sides" and basically offered "non-dumb order execution" as a service to any institutions who were unable to play the speed game themselves. Look at how Virtu's revenue changed from mostly trading to mostly order execution services over that time period.

Flash Boys was always poorly researched and largely ignorant of actual market microstructure and who the relevant market participants were, but it also aged quite poorly as all of their "activism" was useless because the market participants just all smartened up purely profit-driven.

If you want to be activist about something, the best bet for 2026 is probably that so much volume is moving off the lit exchanges into internal matching and it degrades the quality of price discovery happening. But honestly even that's a hard sell because much of that flow is "dumb money" just wanting to transact at the NBBO.

Actually, here's the best thing to be upset about: apps gamifying stock trading / investing into basically SEC-regulated gambling.

▲

Workaccount2 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

This is what should happen, because what the game actually being played is to profit off those who cannot react fast enough to news event, rather than profit off those who mispriced their order.

Or leave things in place, but put a 1 minute transaction freeze during binary events, and fill the order book during that time with no regard for when an order was placed, just random allocation of order fills coming out of the 1 minute pause.

These funds would lose their shit if they had to go back to knowledge being the only edge rather than speed and knowledge.

	▲	neonbrain 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		This isn't a good approach because it assumes there are no market makers on trading venues, and that they (as well as exchanges) do not compete for order flow. Also, maybe you haven't noticed, but stocks are often frozen during news announcements by regulatory request, so such pauses are already in place and are designed to maintain market integrity, not disrupt it with arbitrary fills.

▲

stuxnet79 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The founder Brad Katsuyama talks about his background and motivation for starting the company here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9hoqFpDjVs

It might add a bit of color to this conversation.