| ▲ | ang_cire 3 days ago | |||||||
Not wanting centralization under one company does not equal advocating for "trustless society". All the things you mentioned (registrars, ISPs, registries, etc) have multiple alternative providers you can choose from. Get cut off from GCP, move to AWS. Get banned in Germany, VPS in Sweden. Domain registration revoked, get another domain. Lose your Apple ID, and you're locked out of the entire Apple ecosystem, permanently, period. Even if a US federal court ordered that you could never again legally access the internet, that would only be valid within the US, and you could legally and freely access it by going to any other country. So in fact, rather than everything being equivalent to Apple's singular control, almost nothing is equivalent (really, only another company with a similarly closed ecosystem). | ||||||||
| ▲ | snowe2010 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
If aws decided to block your access to their ecosystem you would lose so so so much more than Apple blocking your access to theirs. If the US decided what you said, t1 networks would restrict your access across much of the planet. Your logic makes no sense since you can easily switch to Google or whatever other smartphone providers there are (China has a bunch). But of course those providers can also cut you off, so what I said still applies. | ||||||||
| ||||||||