| ▲ | ETH_start 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Median income and the purchasing power of disposable income are substantially higher in the U.S. The public sector unions do represent a much larger share of the population than the CEOs but in absolute terms public sector workers constitute a very small share of the population, while receiving a large share of public spending. Given they are being rewarded with huge amounts of tax dollars from the party they help keep/put in power, the concern that there's a systemic pay-to-play dynamic at work is very justified. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hvb2 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> but in absolute terms public sector workers constitute a very small share of the population, while receiving a large share of public spending Uh... Just no? Public spending? That's défense, health care, entitlements etcetera etcetera I'll actually back it up with some numbers too: > That’s 1% of gross domestic product, and almost 5% of total federal spending. The government payroll for other developed countries is typically 5% of GDP, Kettl said. From: https://www.marketplace.org/story/2025/03/06/federal-workers... And this > Median income and the purchasing power of disposable income are substantially higher in the U.S. Not sure what you're basing that on but there's this too > The statistic is used to show how unequal things have become in the U.S.: Some 40% of Americans would struggle to come up with even $400 to pay for an unexpected bill From: https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2021/what-a-400-dolla... So unless they're all spending money irrationally, they have no money to save meaning little or no disposable income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||