| ▲ | lostlogin 2 days ago | |
What about a pacemaker? Or a car? | ||
| ▲ | laggyluke 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
You have a point. Being able to reprogram a pacemaker isn't enough! We should require that any devices that our lives depends on, especially devices that go inside our bodies, to be open source: not just reprogrammable, but with source code available for inspection and modification. I've been working in this industry for too long in order to trust a closed source pacemaker to be bug-free. | ||
| ▲ | pabs3 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
We can have both freedom and safety by requiring re-certification after modification. Like when you heavily physically modify a car then you can still drive it after the authorities decide it is safe. | ||
| ▲ | octoberfranklin 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Cars were user-reprogrammable for a long time and the sky never fell. Requiring that the pacemaker be outside a human body in order to reprogram it seems like a very sensible solution. | ||