I don't know where you get the confidence that any of that matters to SCOTUS. They know their role, and they are playing.

▲

parineum 2 days ago | parent [-]

SCOTUS has ruled against Trump numerous times.

▲

thrance 2 days ago | parent [-]

But they rule in his favor more often than not. They gave him freaking immunity for any crimes he may commit. This alone enables him to disregard the law without any fear of repercussions.

▲

throw0101a 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> This alone enables him to disregard the law without any fear of repercussions.

That does not apply to his lackeys though (unless there's a preemptive pardon).

If (!) there's a change in the President eventually, there needs to be a reckoning for everyone that didn't push back on instructions/orders (including all the folks down the line who are blowing up (alleged) drug boats).

	▲	jeremyjh 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Everyone will have preemptive pardons. That has already been guaranteed to them or we wouldn't see so much open lawlessness.
	▲	dboreham a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That the president can pardon any criminal providing no justification is preposterous nonsense. Much reform is needed.

▲

decremental 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]