| ▲ | MarsIronPI 4 days ago | |||||||||||||
Because HDMI 2.1 uses a proprietary protocol that's not implemented in any free OS[0]. If you want to use HDMI 2.1 features right now, your only option is to use a non-free OS like Windows or MacOS. [0]: This came up recently with Valve: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46220488 | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nottorp 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
It's also a piece of shit that will negotiate whatever it wants with your non free OS instead of giving you unmolested RGB... | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | no_wizard 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
from a purely technical point of view i do wish HDMI 2.1 was able to gain traction. On a couple of things I own that do actually use it, its an actual noticeable improvement and I feel does a better job than DisplayPort. Granted, I suspect quite strongly the next wave of consolidation is going to continue the trend of being around USB-C, since the spec should have the bandwidth to handle any video / audio protocols for quite some time. Matter of time until that happens IMO. It also lets you have a single cord that could theoretically be your power cord and your A/V cord. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MegaDeKay 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Not really. That same link talks about how Intel and nvidia drivers can provide HDMI 2.1 on Linux but it is via their non-free firmware blob. AMD doesn't (can't? won't?) do the same but there is a workaround: a DisplayPort to HDMI adapter using a particular chip running hacked firmware. That'll get you 4K 120 Hz with working FreeSync VRR. https://forum.level1techs.com/t/it-is-possible-to-4k-120-hdr... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||