Are you implying that an LLM needs to be trained on a specific piece of text to answer questions about it?

If you want proper answers, yes. If you want to rely on whatever reddit or tiktok says about the book, then I guess at that point you're fine with hallucinations and others doing the thinking for you anyway. Hence the issues brought up in the article.

I wouldn't trust an LLM for anything more than the most basic questions of it didn't actually have text to cite.

	▲	catgary 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Luckily, the LLM has the text to cite, it can be passed in at inference time, which is legally distinct from training on the data.
	▲	terafo 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Having access to the text and being trained on the text are two different things.