> It's not that direct a counterexample.

Amazon made a video with AI summarizing their own show, and got it broadly wrong. Why would we expect their book analysis to be dramatically better - especially as far fewer human eyes are presumably on the summaries of some random book that sold 500 copies than official marketing pushes for the Fallout show.

▲

dcre 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

For the reason I gave in my answer: it would be answering based on the text of the book. I don't expect it to be particularly great regardless because these features always use cheap models.

▲

ceejayoz 3 days ago | parent [-]

> For the reason I gave in my answer: it would be answering based on the text of the book.

Why would that not also be true for the Fallout season one recap video?

▲

dcre 3 days ago | parent [-]

Did you read a word past the part of my answer you quoted?

	▲	ceejayoz 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Of course. I’m just not sure how “the Kindle feature’s cheap models are gonna be even worse at the task” helps your point.

▲

catgary 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Because text analysis is substantially easier than video analysis?

	▲	ceejayoz 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Amazon has the Fallout scripts, subtitles, internal show bibles, etc. all available to them.