| ▲ | jjice 2 days ago | |||||||
I'd expect nothing less from them. The right thing to do here is to implement a sorting key for different categories here. Since McMaster-Carr seems to be going to a category when you search, they seem to have better control over the available filters. I've found that on a site like Amazon or Walmart that'll let you do a more freeform sort, the filter options becomes absolutely god awful. Well done by McMaster-Carr. I assume they control their inventory a bit more than a marketplace like Home Depot, Walmart, or Amazon, so that's also an advantage. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pacoWebConsult 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The schemas for Amazon and Walmart's product information are absolutely bonkers and constantly missing features that they demand be provided. Here's the XML Schema Definition for "Product" on Amazon [1] This is joined on each of the linked category schemas included at the type, of which each has unique properties that ultimately drive the metadata on a particular listing for the SKU. Its wrought with inconsistency, duplicated fields, and oftentimes not up-to-date with required information. Ultimately, this product catalog information gets provided to Amazon, Walmart, Target, and any other large 3rd party marketplace site as a feed file from a vendor to drive what product they can then list pricing and inventory against (through similar feeds). You are right that the control McMaster-Carr has on their catalog is the strategic and technological advantage. [1]: https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/rainier/... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||