| ▲ | runarberg 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mining asteroids is a goal that makes sense. I can picture a future where spacecrafts are regularly sent to the asteroid belt and come back to earth with some minerals. Living on the moon does not make sense. There is nothing to be gained from humans living in a future moon base. Not any more than cities built in Antarctica, or in orbit with a constellation of ISS like satellites. We won’t build a city on the Moon, nor Mars, nor any of Jupiter’s moons, nor anywhere outside of Earth, and we won‘t do this even if engineeringly possible, for the exact same reason we won’t build a bubble city inside the Mariana Trench. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mining asteroids makes no sense whatsoever with any currently imaginable practical tech, especially not economically. The numbers for even the most basic solutions just don't work, and anything cleverer - like adding thrusters to chunks of metal and firing them at the Earth - has one or two rather obvious issues. The Moon is interesting because it's there, it's fairly close, it's a test bed for off-world construction, manufacturing, and life support, and there are experiments you can do on the dark side that aren't possible elsewhere. Especially big telescopes. It has many of the same life support issues as Mars, and any Moon solutions are likely to work on Mars and the asteroids, more quickly and successfully than trying to do the same R&D far, far away. Will it pay for itself? Not for a long, long time. But frontier projects rarely do. The benefit comes from the investment, the R&D, the new science and engineering, and the jobs created. It's also handy if you need a remote off-site backup. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||