| ▲ | krapp 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> But it’s a hell of a lot better than sifting through thousands of transactions manually which accountants do and get wrong all the time. I still wonder why humans getting things wrong is a problem, but LLMs getting more things more wrong more often than humans never is. At the very least you'll need a human accountant around to verify the LLM. Or I guess you could just practice "vibe accountancy" and hope things work out but that seems like a worse idea than a trained human professional. But I'm probably just a Luddite. Also, I am admittedly not an accountant, but I don't think they manually sift through every transaction to verify compliance issues in every single case. That probably isn't how that works. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mierz00 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be clear, I agree with you. Our target market is accountants. I want to help them not replace them. In the same way security audit tools aren’t replacing professionals, but that can help on initial scan. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bluefirebrand 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I still wonder why humans getting things wrong is a problem, but LLMs getting more things more wrong more often than humans never is Some people hate humanity so much that they cannot wait to replace us all with AI so they never have to interact with another human ever again That's honestly the only reason I can think that they are so biased toward AI | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||