| ▲ | thayne 5 days ago | |
But it also makes it easier for library developers to identify that a change is breaking. Without static types you can easily make a change you think is fine, but it ends up breaking user code because they depended on something you didn't expect. Granted, static typing doesn't completely solve that problem, there can still be changes in behavior that break things, but it is a useful tool in identifying certain classes of breaking changes. | ||
| ▲ | dec0dedab0de 4 days ago | parent [-] | |
yes, that is my point. | ||