> Another alternative would be that you get what you get at purchase time, and you have to buy a new car to get the newest update.

Doubt that is a politically tenable model.

"You're telling me my son Bobby died in a crash that could have been prevented with finished software but they only roll it out to people who have the money for a new car despite no technical limitation?" -- yeah, good luck

▲

rangestransform 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Think about how many hoopties are already on the road with broken lights, bad alignment, bald tires, no ABS/ESP/TC, dangerous suspension geometry like semi trailing arms, no oil changes, etc. Why don’t we start handwringing about poor vehicle maintenance?

▲

whimsicalism 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

If it is a self-driving software update that the manufacturer could push but chooses not to (or could trivially port), I think it becomes much more difficult liability-wise and legally for them. I'm not saying that is the correct way, but I think it is how it would work in practice.

▲

bluGill 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

We do in some places. Where I live (Iowa) we don't - but most people take better care of their car than that so it is pointless. As a kid I remember parts of MN requiring inspection and a few years latter dropping it when they realized nearly every car was passing so there was no point (this was emissions only not safety). In Texas there are regular inspections - but if you go to border towns you see a lot of those poorly maintained cars on the road (despite the inspection) and so people see more need for them and they keep them.

	▲	MangoToupe 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		See this is why people in iowa don't deserve a senator

▲

margalabargala 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean that's basically how every car with half-assed barely-functional auto lane keeping sold in the last 7 years has worked.

▲

whimsicalism 4 days ago | parent [-]

i think self-driving changes the calculus

▲

margalabargala 4 days ago | parent [-]

Relying on crappy lane keeping and crappy self driving are equally dangerous. If poor software drives you off the road, why does it matter what the feature was named?

	▲	whimsicalism 4 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I don't disagree on the practical level, but I think that optically it is significantly different.
	▲	ehsankia 4 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Anything before L4 is "driver assist", which means at the end of the day, the buck stops at the driver. Anything beyond L4, the car itself drives without requiring supervision, which makes a big difference. It's your responsibility to use lane assist in a reasonable way, it's not your responsibility to control how an L4 drives anymore. That's the point of self-driving, the "self" is responsible.