| ▲ | stavros 2 days ago |
| Why would I own a car when I can Waymo one? |
|
| ▲ | TulliusCicero 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Having your stuff in it already, it's always available immediately (for you), not needing to worry as much about getting it dirty at the beach or with a dog, going to remote places where calling a Waymo may be infeasible or would take a really long time. Probably also cheaper if you drive really frequently. |
|
| ▲ | Rebelgecko 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't know you or your situation, but many people (including the idealized version of Rivian's target market) like going places that Waymo currently doesn't. There's also tradeoffs with cost, wait time, # of passengers, cargo, etc. Some people may also want to automate "boring" driving while still having the option to do "fun" driving |
|
| ▲ | nradov 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My cars are more than just transportation. They're mobile storage lockers where I can keep my stuff reasonably secure. They're a place to sit warm and dry while I wait for something else. They're (semi) private changing rooms where I can put on my cycling kit. Regardless of who does the driving I'll never give up owning (or at least leasing) my own private cars. |
|
| ▲ | paxys 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why do people own cars when they can just Uber? |
| |
| ▲ | testing22321 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Because it’s not convenient enough, and too expensive. Fix those two and personal car ownership will plummet in many places. Many people don’t want to own a car, pay for insurance, gas, tires, oil changes, parking, washing etc. Car ownership sucks horribly for most people, it’s just currently the best option. That will change. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill a day ago | parent | next [-] | | > pay for insurance, gas, tires, oil changes, parking, washing etc. If you use a car you are paying for those costs. There is no getting around it. If you uber it is indirect, but part of your costs per ride is going to those things. Renting a car gets someone else to do them - but you are paying them to do that somehow. (self driving make trade parking for gas where parking is expensive, so in the densits areas this can make sense, but only because the car is driving empty out to the suburbs in the morning and empty back into the city in the evening - so it increases traffic) If you own your car you can choose to not keep it clean. The rental will not allow that choice and so you pay for it. | | |
| ▲ | testing22321 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | > If you use a car you are paying for those costs Yes, but I don’t use my car 24/7. Soon I won’t have to pay for it when I’m not using it. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | It won't be much if any difference. Rush hour is when most people are trying to get around. Worse, they are all trying to get to the same place, so if you are thinking two trips downtown - that means there is an unoccupied trip back out to the suburbs every morning (and again in the evening) - perhaps more if we are also parking in the suburbs where parking is cheap (though this is probably offset by the cost of parking downtown) |
|
| |
| ▲ | paxys 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And why do you think Waymo will fix all of this? | | |
| ▲ | llbeansandrice 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This is better solved by leveraging more traditional forms of transportation. Making biking, walking, and various forms of transit easier, safer, and more effective. Cars, whether self-driving or not, are in direct opposition to this. I'm sure they could be useful to folks that have the specific use-case for it, but the vast vast majority of trips in a person's day-to-day are better solved by robust multi-modal options and public transit. The benefit there is that less drivers means that traffic is actually better for everyone. | | |
| ▲ | testing22321 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I agree with you broadly in principle, but sadly cities in North America have been built for cars, and so they are by far the best way to get around | | |
| ▲ | llbeansandrice a day ago | parent [-] | | I actually see this as a benefit! Cars take up a lot of space and so now there exists massive right of ways that can be used and modified for other transit modes. Take a lane away from personal cars and dedicate it to buses so they can run faster and avoid traffic. Remove some street parking spots and create a protected bike lane or a street market or something else. The extra space can be a huge boon. It’s pavement, basically a blank canvas imo. | | |
| ▲ | testing22321 a day ago | parent [-] | | Agree. But nobody is going to walk or ride in Calgary or Dallas no matter how many lanes you take away. Too much sprawl, too severe weather. There are hundreds of cities like that sadly. | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | testing22321 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t particularly think that. Someone will, I don’t know who. Soon. |
| |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | ks2048 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Almost all these points apply ride hailing with or without driver-less. How do Waymo prices compare to Uber where Waymo exists? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mulderc 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m with you but there are plenty of places where public transit is superior to driving and people still drive. |
|
| ▲ | m463 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you want to leave the waymo boundaries? |
|
| ▲ | jen20 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because lugging around two child seats when you get out at the other end fucking sucks. |
|
| ▲ | stackedinserter a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Can you waimo to another city or to camping? |
