| ▲ | foxheadman an hour ago |
| I used to hear about COSMIC and think "Glad to see more choice, but I doubt this will go anywhere". I wanted a Sway-like experience but with a desktop experience, and so tried it. It's surprisingly good: a DE with powerful enough window tiling. It's now my daily driver. Since they're backed by a sole company, I'm still not convinced on their longevity, but remain hopeful! I'm not familiar with Pop OS, which I now realise is what the post is. |
|
| ▲ | tmtvl 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I hard bounced off COSMIC with the complete lack of theming. I can't even set my clock to a reasonable format in it. The only thing it has going for it is sane multi-monitor support, which neither KDE nor GNOME have gotten right so far (though at KDE there is some activity around it, dunno 'bout GNOME). |
| |
| ▲ | jorvi 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I really hate that at some point in the past, KDE developers decided that they hated how deeply intuitive virtual desktops are and deprecated them in favor of something deeply unintuitive (Activities). Any issue or complaint mentioning it is shot down with "you're holding it wrong." Please just give virtual desktops first class support and lets forget about the Activities experiment. Most users hate it. The attitude regarding it is about as bad as Gnome forcing Overview on everyone, refusing to provide a first party dock or lightweight launcher. Despite almost every distro and 95% of Gnome users immediately installing Dash to Dock. | |
| ▲ | dontlaugh 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | What’s wrong with Gnome’s multi monitor support? My two monitors even have different pixel density. |
|
|
| ▲ | bryanlarsen 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have you tried the new-ish KDE window tiling? (Super-T by default) I had a similar desire to you, and am quite happy with what KDE provided. It'd be interesting to read a comparison between the two. Although I'm happy enough with what KDE gives me that COSMIC would have to be substantially better before I'd endure the switching costs. |
|
| ▲ | nartho an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I like tiling a lot more than I like floating windows. Cosmic is my daily driver and is awesome. I just wish it had a bit more customization options, I don't want to spend days rummaging through wikis like with hyprland but having a bit more control over it would be nice, not a deal breaker though |
|
| ▲ | criddell 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I skimmed the linked story and I still don’t really know what POP!_OS is. They are using the Linux kernel and wrote their own desktop environment, but what’s in between that? Does it include all the GNU system tools? Is there a lot of software that takes advantage of the COSMIC desktop environment? Do they have an App Store? Is it closer to something like Ubuntu or is it more like Android? |
| |
| ▲ | mghackerlady 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It's ubuntu with their own desktop and app store (kinda like mint) its also known for being the best linux experience for nvidia users. It's designed for power users and gamers | |
| ▲ | jsk2600 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's based on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, with their own DE | | |
| ▲ | dsego 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Does it use snap packages? | | |
| ▲ | akdor1154 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | They attempt to avoid them, though snaps are still available if you wish. Flatpak is installed by default and used by their app store, and Firefox is packaged as a deb so you can avoid the snap. I consider it a deshittified Ubuntu. | |
| ▲ | cguess 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | yes |
| |
| ▲ | criddell 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Based on Ubuntu? So is it basically Ubuntu with Gnome removed and COSMIC added? How compatible are the two OS's? They show icons for Steam, Chrome, Firefox, Zoom, etc... Does that mean they are maintaining their own fork of those applications built for COSMIC? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | panick21_ an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I think even if the company goes away we will see this continue. It modern it rust and some if its fundamentals are already used by other projects. Of course not same way, but its not just going away. |
| |
| ▲ | pjmlp 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I was introduced to UNIX in 1993, Linux in 1995's Summmer, and have lost count how many X Windows desktops or windows managers have come and gone in 32 years. | | |
| ▲ | criddell 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What's been your favorite? I wasted too much time tweaking Enlightenment. I remember that was fun but I don't really remember much about actually using it. OS/2's Workplace Shell feels like the biggest lost opportunity (and has nothing to do with UNIXy stuff). I really liked Rexx and the SOM stuff felt cleaner than what became COM in Windows. |
|
|