| ▲ | Pingk 4 hours ago | |
This isn't a good idea regardless of why it's being deprecated. If it's no longer being maintained then put a depreciation warning and let it break on its own. Changing a deprecated feature just means you could maintain it but don't want to. Alternatively if you want to aggressively push people to migrate to the new version, have a clear development roadmap and force a hard error at the end of the depreciation window so you know in advance how long you can expect it to work and can document your code accordingly. This wishy-washy half-broken behaviour doesn't help anyone | ||