| ▲ | taeric 2 days ago | |||||||
Ish. If the car costs 10x, then they will stick to not having one. See Tokyo. Again, I lived for over a decade with a tech job and no car. In Atlanta. It is easily doable. Especially for younger people that don't have a family. When I got married and we started having kids, I never had "my" car. Stayed on transit and cycling to get to work. It is frustrating, because I would be surrounded by progressive people at work that would go on about why transit doesn't work. But... it did. Just fine. You just can't also have a 4k square foot house at the same time. (I feel like I'm exaggerating, but that is literally the size of average home in some areas just around Seattle. My shared living in Atlanta was almost 1000 square feet. I remember dreaming of a 650 square foot "luxury apartment" someday.) | ||||||||
| ▲ | panick21_ a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
If a car cost 10x but public transport is 20x worse then people will still buy cars unless they can't afford it. Look it might be easily doable for you, but the data shows pretty clearly that if one thing is easier and faster then another, most people, not all people will pick what is easier and faster. There are always 10-20% of people who will just prefer one thing, no matter what. See people who ride bikes in horrible dangerous conditions threw traffic. You might be willing to, but most people are not. But what you need is a system with enough quality that enough people use it so they can demand continued increases in quality. | ||||||||
| ||||||||