| ▲ | drunner 2 days ago | |
I was all for this legislation, thinking the positives outweighed the cost, but after reading the list of affected services, I now disagree. Why didn't they just legislate that all social media apps content must be like Facebook in 2005. No recommendations, chronological timeline only, and you only see posts from users you explicitly added. That would have benefited everyone forever, and not enabled some small subset of apps to collect your govt id or the law to be irrelevant when the next popular social network comes along. They effectively banned only the popular cigarette brands, instead of regulating nicotine. If services would argue this would make them all the same, then add a clause where the user can opt in to have an algorithm shove content at them like now if they are over 18. This way everyone can use the basic service for true socializing, but the harmful stuff is actually regulated out by default. Too much money etc for this to ever happen, but geez they could have done a lot better. | ||