IMO as soon as the investment dry this is going to be seen as "smart" and "grounded" but it should have been the only way of doing.

Having VC gamble on start-up all the time is just not sustainable. If a product is not generating $ then maybe it deserves to die

> If a product is not generating $ then maybe it deserves to die

Somewhat agree. Depends on the product, if its novel and does not do its job well enough to generate a revenue stream it does yea. If it's in a market where some big corp has a monopoly I'd love to be able to see whether the monopoly killed it silently, like Amazon does with many many startups (predatory pricing).

Monopolies are creating unfair competition scenarios for businesses ensuring them to stay alone at the top... Idk what happened to competition but im tired of local shops closing due to people buying everything from a predatory corporation.