| ▲ | re-thc 2 days ago | |
> I believe that the line in the sand over which platforms this applies to is the ones that You know a law is broken when its definition is defined by random people "knowing" where and how it applies. > This sort of ban is the same as existing laws banning the sale and consumption of alcohol or driving No it's not. Is every social media platform banned? How is it defined? This is the equivalent of going into a supermarket with a "kids" alcohol section and 1 for everyone else hand-picked by whoever in charge. | ||
| ▲ | rusk 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
Like the worlds richest man claiming to be a free speech absolutist. Because you just know the sappy fuck has your best interests at heart. > You know a law is broken when its definition is defined by random people "knowing" where and how it applies. | ||