| ▲ | genewitch 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
How come any area that has enough homes in the data set and ALPR have Veterinarians as the most surveilled, then Hospitals, then Libraries, usually over everything else, including food and church? The strange implication is that they're watching the vet office traffic to find people who are getting treated by vets instead of doctors? also my parish reports 0.0% across the board, and all the parishes near me. you have to get on the coast to get above 25%. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sodality2 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vets/hospitals are far less common (and the former probably suffers from less tags as hospitals are more important) so the distance one must travel increases, so higher likelihood of crossing one. Especially compared to how common everything else is. If you check deflock.me, would you say that 0.0% aligns with what you expect? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | renewiltord 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Perhaps there's some large chain of vets run by a PE firm where the PE firm did a blanket deal. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||