| ▲ | 2OEH8eoCRo0 3 days ago | |
It will be interesting to see how this pans out. I think many in tech are afraid that this will lead to a positive outcome. | ||
| ▲ | squigz 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
I'm afraid that this will lead to no change to the issues it purports to fix, and then we'll... do nothing with that information. | ||
| ▲ | mrweasel 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Really, I think most people in tech generally believe that getting teens of social media will be a positive thing. The question is how to go about it. It's understandable, to some extend, that people will protest government interference, but it's also an industry that have repeatedly show itself to be incapable of regulation itself. I don't really see the big surprise, most government are relatively hands of, until you prove that you're incapable of regulating yourself. Most regulation happens after the damage is done. I do think that 16 is a bit low, I'd like to have seen it be 18, or a complete ban on algorithmically generated feeds (I believe the latter would be the better option). | ||