| |
| ▲ | DocTomoe 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Which means they also do no longer benefit from family-grouped Youtube Premium, which means MORE ADS ... which is exactly what we tried to prevent, right? | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | YouTube just needs to create a kids account feature which can’t post or comment. | | |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 3 days ago | parent [-] | | They already have that. Youtube Kids. And it works horribly because apparently Family Guy counts as "for kids". And that's not even the tip of the iceberg on the problems presented. Tech is trying to push all these wonderful LLM's on us, telling us how it works like magic. Meanwhile, it can't even follow basic public TV labeling. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Youtube kids is designed for toddlers, and should probably be shut down entirely. What I'm talking about is something designed for 14 year olds where they can still subscribe to channels, have paid ad free, parental controls, etc. But not upload videos or use it in a social media way. | | |
| ▲ | eimrine 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Youtube (regular one) is already designed to be kids-friendly. There are no war images since recent AI moderation rollout. There are a lot of very forbidden words which can lead to ban account. There are a lot of mildly forbidden words which just do not appear in subtitle. You can not say anything bully on comments - it will be removed instantly. I don't consider anything bad in YT except of the whole top of popular bloggers - because they are clearly aimed at low-IQ people. Just don't be a stupid, and your kids will not watch the bloggers. Buy more instruments of all kinds for your kids and they will watch a lot of educational videos explaining different know-hows. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | osn9363739 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The main target of these bans algorithmic content curation and the addictive nature of such algorithms and the possible harmful content that could be presented. So no? | | |
| ▲ | tigroferoce 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Maybe that instead of protesting against the regulation we should ask the platforms to provide ads-free and algorithm-free service to kids under 16. | | |
| ▲ | fireflash38 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Interesting. I don't know if you intended it, but algorithm free means no recommendations to me - even no recommended videos alongside existing videos. You want a video? You have to search for something. I think that is a surprisingly good solution. You can still access educational information, or really whatever videos you want, but you have to actively seek them out rather than ingest whatever is spit out at you. | | |
| ▲ | mat_b 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Search results are pretty much the same thing though. It's a ranked list of recommended videos. It's just based on your text instead of the video you're watching. | |
| ▲ | osn9363739 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've used plugins like unhook in the past which do exactly this and it's nice. Now I just follow channels via rss and block everything else on the page. Same deal. |
| |
| ▲ | osn9363739 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd support that. |
| |
| ▲ | fogj094j0923j4 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah but content curation ( e.g. building your own Alrogrithm TM ) is the only way you get out of the advertisement hell of Youtube. Browsing Youtube on Incognito and your feeds filled with Mr Beast and Tryphobia AI Generated contents. | | |
| ▲ | eimrine 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Don't use recommendations unless showing to YT that your request are always great and just don't click lowball content even once on your first hours of using YT new profile. |
|
|
|
|
