| ▲ | Dylan16807 3 days ago | |||||||||||||
> Ask a woman in a liquor store whether her anonymity is maintained by this scenario...? Is she not going to say "pretty well compared to a surveillance database, one or two people that are probably going to forget immediately"? > The current liquor store approach for buying liquor is hazardous for a good chunk of people What chunk of people? Are you trying to imply that this chunk includes women in general? It's really easy to find random women without looking at an ID. If this is about addresses, anyone taking actions based on "a woman probably lives here" has about the same effect as picking houses at random. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pryce 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
> Is she not going to say "pretty well compared to a surveillance database" No, instead she is likely to avoid talking in abstractions and instead talk about personal experiences of getting stalked online by multiple people she has had to show her details to in the past, who may include storekeeps, police, university staff, etc, etc. Eva Galperin is an excellent source on the way many of our procedures are designed in ways that do not at all account for the potential of stalking and harassment, though her focus is on how this continues to unfold in the technology space. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||