Remix.run Logo
qoez 3 days ago

[flagged]

Spooky23 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Is it morally OK as long as they pay their 25% vig to POTUS?

The concept of morality in this context is absurd.

3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
jyscao 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Projection. China does not even try to export their ideologies to the rest of the world who they see as clearly different culturally. The “west” OTOH does not have a good track record of that.

pedroma 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's interesting how this sounds like projection to me as well, from the perspective that China does export their ideology. Your post itself seems to be a form of that, whether you're Chinese or not.

knowitnone3 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

China certainly does export their ideologies by telling the world Taiwan is part of China and telling others to not recognize Taiwan as a country. They also have major if not direct influence on Myanmar's civil war. North Korea. Let's not forget the taking land(India, tibet) and extending their borders with man-made islands so they can extend their fishing territories. that's a great track record. you're not biased at all.

higginsniggins 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How about and.... this might be too radical for you but here me out...... no one with "dominance for humanity overall"

behringer 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I like how you're careful to use the "west" because if you had said US your argument would have been laughable.

forinti 3 days ago | parent [-]

Most European countries did awful things during their colonial years, some late into the XX century. Some still do shady things in Africa right now. And they all welcome money siphoned off peripheral countries by crooks.

Nobody can claim moral superiority.

platevoltage 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Give me 1 reason why the USA, the (for now) leader of "the west", is morally superior to China?

xp84 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I’ve got one. The US doesn’t mow down its citizens with tanks for protesting, and then perpetually suppress all discussion of the incident.

(Yes, there have been situations that are similar in theme, but they paw in comparison to that incident.)

platevoltage 2 days ago | parent [-]

You felt the need to backpedal before hitting submit, so you're almost there.

nish__ 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China doesn't allow people to freely leave the country. How is that ok?

nish__ 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

whatevermom3 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I see Chinese citizens traveling abroad every day. Doesn't look like they cannot travel. Freedom of what exactly? Are you really free in America when you have to toil away 12 hours per day to make ends meet? Honestly funny to see people falling for American propaganda.

nish__ 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

They only let some of them out. And it's hard to get a passport. Most other countries work the opposite way. You need approval to enter. In China, you need approval to exit.

amanaplanacanal 2 days ago | parent [-]

Personally, I'm against both of those.

nish__ 2 days ago | parent [-]

So just no borders? That's fair I guess.

amanaplanacanal a day ago | parent [-]

One way to think about it: if every country prevents people from entering, the effect is exactly the same as one country preventing people from leaving.

nickthegreek 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Very few Americans commenting here have to toil away for 12 hours to make ends meet.

thrance 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China's economy is very much capitalist.

platevoltage 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh god, it's like talking to my Dad. What is Communism?

nish__ 3 days ago | parent [-]

Your Dad is wise. And you can Google it.

platevoltage 2 days ago | parent [-]

It's fine if you don't know.

nish__ 2 days ago | parent [-]

Communism is a political and economic ideology aiming for a classless society where the community, rather than individuals, owns major resources like factories and land, distributing wealth based on need.