And to add info, an F-150 will change brake pads 3-7 times over 200k miles, while a Model Y will still be on the original set with nearly no sign of wear.

▲

fsckboy 2 days ago | parent [-]

but compare the wear of the tires, and weigh tires vs brakes by the amount of "total pollution delivered to the environment", i.e. 20% more wear of something that is 2x as polluting is 40% more pollution. I don't know the numbers or the answer, I'm just saying it's not as simple as your statement makes it out to be.

▲

coryrc 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Why are you just making up numbers then saying "it's not as simple"? Try educating yourself a little first instead of just jumping to conclusions which reinforce your existing biases.

▲

brailsafe 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> 20% more wear of something that is 2x as polluting is 40% more pollution

If an equivalent car wore down its tires 20% slower, and those tire particles contributed 2x the intensity of pollution than other types of wear-based pollution, than the increase in produced pollution from that source seems like it would be ~16%, not 40%.

If one car drives 100 km and produces 2 units of pollution per km, that would be 200 units. Another car wearing 20% more would produce 240 units, or roughly ~16% more.

	▲	yunwal 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		> Another car wearing 20% more would produce 240 units, or roughly ~16% more. This is some Fermat’s Last Theorem shit