Totally fair callout and appreciate the feedback. We’re already testing alternative hero layouts focused purely on real customer results and example issues caught. Our goal is to win trust by demonstrating usefulness/results, not who invested in us.

▲

an_aparallel 3 days ago | parent [-]

where would my firms documents end up (on whos servers) to do this checking? I dont know how any firm would just hand out their cd's just like that?

Or is being that lax normal these days?

Aside: this field is insanely frustrating, the chasm between clash detection and resolution is a right ball ache...between acc, revizto, and aconex clash detection (and the like)..the defacto standard is pretty much telling me x is touching y....great...can you group this crap intelligently to get my hi rise clashes per discipline from 2000 down to 10? Can you navigate me there in revit (yes switchback in revizto is great) but revizto itself could improve.

▲

aakashprasad91 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Yes one of the biggest values of our system is reducing “noise.” Instead of surfacing 2,000 micro-clashes, we cluster findings into higher-order issues (e.g., “all conflicts caused by this duct run” or “all lighting mismatches tied to this dimming spec”). We’re not a BIM viewer yet, but we do map issues back to sheet locations, callouts, and detail references so teams can navigate directly to the real source of the problem.

▲

an_aparallel 2 days ago | parent [-]

Sounds good, what is the typical workflow aggregating sheet sets in question for a certain phase? I assume user collates and drops for analysis?

	▲	aakashprasad91 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Today the workflow is simple: users just drag-and-drop the full drawing/spec set (ZIP or PDFs) for whatever phase they want reviewed. The system automatically splits sheets by discipline, reconstructs callout relationships, and runs the checks. We’ll be adding integrations with ACC/Procore/Revit exports so this becomes even more automated.
	▲	aakashprasad91 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes today users simply gather the sheets for whatever phase they want reviewed (DD, 80% CDs, 100% CDs, etc.), ZIP them or upload PDFs directly, and the system handles the rest. It auto-detects disciplines, reconstructs callout graphs, and runs checks across the full set. We're also adding integrations with ACC/Procore/Revit so sheet aggregation becomes automatic.

▲

aakashprasad91 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We store files securely on AWS with strict access controls, encryption in transit and at rest, and zero sharing outside the file owner’s account. Only our engineers can access a project for debugging and only if the customer explicitly allows it. We can also offer an enterprise option with private cloud/VPC deployment for firms that require even tighter controls. Users can delete all files permanently at any time.

▲

shuangly 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Documents are stored on AWS with strict access controls, meaning they are only accessible to the file owner and, if necessary, our engineers for debugging purposes. After the check, users can delete the project and optionally permanently delete the files from our S3 buckets on AWS.