| ▲ | DiogenesKynikos 2 hours ago | |||||||
Even though firearms were well and truly established by the 17th Century, blade weapons remained important right on through to the mid-1800s. Bayonet charges were a major aspect of Napoleonic warfare, and only really went away with the development of firearms that had higher rates of fire and were accurate out to larger ranges. In the Napoleonic era, soldiers would close to within 50-100 meters, fire off a few volleys, and then charge in with the bayonet. By the time armies were equipped with breech-loading rifles that could fire half a dozen accurate shots a minute at a distance of a few hundred meters, the volume and accuracy of fire made the bayonet charge obsolete. But that was rather late (the 1860s or so). | ||||||||
| ▲ | dghf 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
IIRC, the British Army employed bayonet charges in Afghanistan and Iraq in the 2000s. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Tuna-Fish an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Bayonet charges were not obsolete, but the killing in war was done by fire. See, for example: https://journals.gold.ac.uk/index.php/bjmh/article/download/... By the Napoleonic Wars, something below 10% of casualties were caused by melee weapons. And even that was mostly cavalry, bayonets account for ~2%. The purpose of the bayonet charge was not to kill your enemy, it was to convince your weakened enemy to cede his position after you had already done the killing. The forces rarely fought hand-to-hand and when they did it was notable, usually one side was so weakened and shocked that they fled or refused to charge. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | rjsw 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Bayonets have been used recently in Afghanistan. | ||||||||