| ▲ | keyle 4 hours ago | |||||||
What are you actually answering to? | ||||||||
| ▲ | kubb 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I agree, seems off topic but let’s be kind. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | Joel_Mckay 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Reply to bypass a nonsense slop-article that doesn't actually offer any legitimate insights into workmanship standards. Follow the 10 rules on the single wiki page, and C becomes a lot less challenging to stabilize. Could also look at why C and Assembly is still used where metastability considerations matter. If you spend your days in user-space Applications, than don't worry about it... A bit of history where these rules came from, and why they matter. =3 "Why Fighter Jets Ban 90% of C++ Features" | ||||||||