| |
| ▲ | lmm 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Newer web servers have already moved away from C/C++. Web browsers have been written in restricted subsets of C/C++ with significant additional tooling for decades at this point, and are already beginning to move to Rust. | | |
| ▲ | drnick1 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There is not a single major browser written in Rust. Even Ladybird, a new project, adopted C++. | | |
| ▲ | lmm 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Firefox and Chrome already contain significant amounts of Rust code, and the proportion is increasing. | | |
| ▲ | vbezhenar 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | https://github.com/chromium/chromium : C++ 74.0%, Java 8.8%, Objective-C++ 4.8%,
TypeScript 4.2%, HTML 2.5%, Python 2.4%, Other 3.3% https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox : JavaScript 28.9%, C++ 27.9%, HTML 21.8%, C 10.4%, Python 2.9%, Kotlin 2.7%, Other 5.4% How significant? | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | RealityVoid 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Web browsers have been written in restricted subsets of C/C++ with significant additional tooling for decades at this point So, written in C/C++? It seems to me you're trying to make a point that reality doesn't agree with but you stubbornly keep pushing it. | | |
| ▲ | lmm 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > So, written in C/C++? Not in the sense that people who are advocating writing new code in C/C++ generally mean. If someone is advocating following the same development process as Chrome does, then that's a defensible position. But if someone is advocating developing in C/C++ without any feature restrictions or additional tooling and arguing "it's fine because Chrome uses C/C++", no, it isn't. |
|
|
|