I don't want videos of me online. Would an audio recording + slides suffice in your opinion? Or would you doubt it was really live in front of a sufficiently large audience? Idk how common fraud here would be

▲

benjojo12 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I feel like if you don't want videos (and I assume photos) of you online then speaking at a conference is probably not the aligned action to pursue that goal

▲

michaelt 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you're the sort of private person who doesn't want a big online presence - why bother to speak at a software conference? Especially a conference big enough they're selective about who they allow to present?

About 90% of speakers at big events are there to promote their product, or to get their company's name out there for recruitment purposes, or to promote their consultancy, or to build their personal brand. If you don't give a shit about any of that stuff, maybe you don't need to bother?

	▲	ghaff 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'd probably put it more diplomatically. But if you're speaking at a conference, there may be video, audio, and photographs which may be posted online and may be part of the terms you sign up for when you register. If any of that bothers you, you may not want to speak.

▲

ValentineC 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I don't want videos of me online.

This is just my personal opinion, but your expertise in your proposed topic would have to be really good (i.e. you've written a few blog posts about it) for a conference to overlook this.

Recorded videos act as a portfolio for both potential speakers and conferences alike. I think some first-time attendees rely on past videos to determine whether a conference is worth going for.

(That said, we've set videos as unlisted for people who think that they've bombed their talks before — think leaving the stage in tears because the Q&A was harsh — but that's just goodwill.)

▲

ghaff 9 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know how often recorded videos are viewed--conference committees have to wade through a lot of applications.

But conference presentations are basically public events and if that bothers you, you should probably reconsider doing one. (Yes, per parent, if there's a real disaster--and those happen--they may be deep-sixed but I wouldn't count on it.)

	▲	ValentineC 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> I don't know how often recorded videos are viewed--conference committees have to wade through a lot of applications. For most conferences that do blind-rating first, only in subsequent rounds when the programme is being put together.

▲

simonw 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Personally I would find a video that's slides with audio just as compelling as a video where the speaker was visible in terms of helping me understand if that person could give a competent presentation or not.

▲

Ayesh 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I imagine it'll go against your talk getting into the shortlist.

But there are some conferences that ask and respect your preference whether you'd like the video recording to have your face or just the audio. But I have yet to see a conference that go as far as asking the audience to not take photos of the presenter, so it's pretty much moot if you do not want your photos published at all.

	▲	em-bee 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		i have seen presenters directly ask the audience to not take pictures. i think it's reasonable request, so i don't think it's a moot point.