Is the Linux Foundation basically a dumping ground for projects that corporations no longer want to finance but still keep control over?

Facebook still has de facto control over PyTorch.

▲

somnium_sn 13 hours ago | parent [-]

It has little to do with financing. In addition to the development cost there is now also a membership fee.

What a donation to the Linux foundation offers is ensuring that the trademarks are owned by a neutral entity, that the code for the SDKs and ownership of the organization is now under a neutral entity. For big corporations these are real concerns and that’s what the LF offers.

	▲	mikeyouse 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It would be a crazy antitrust violation for all of these companies to work together on something closed source - e.g. if Facebook/Google/Microsoft all worked on some software project and then kept it for themselves. By hosting it at a neutral party with membership barriers but no technical barriers (you need to pay to sit on the governing board, but you don't need to pay to use the technology), you can have collaboration without FTC concerns. Makes a ton of sense and really is a great way to keep tech open.