| ▲ | burnt-resistor 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Very cool. It's all about that 80-bit/82-bit floating point format with the explicit mantissa bit just to be extra different. ;) Not only is it a 1:15:1:63, it's (2(tag)):1:15:1:63, whereas binary64 is 1:11:0:52. (sign:exponent [biased]:explicit leading mantissa bit stored?:manitissa remaining) Other pre-P5 ISA idiosyncrasies: Only the 8087 has FDISI/FNDISI, FENI/FNENI. Only the plain 287 has a functional FSETPM. Most everything else looks like a 387 ISA-wise, more or less until MMX arrived. That's all I know. I'm curious what the CX-83D87 and Weiteks look like. Keep up the good work! PS: Perhaps sometime in the (near) future we might get almost 1:1 silicon "OCR" transcription of die scans to FPGA RTL with bugs and all? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | adrian_b an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
A significant difference in 80387 versus 80287 & 8087 was that in 387 you could no longer select the "projective" behavior for infinities (where positive and negative infinities are identical). This feature had not been included in the IEEE standard, so it was no longer implemented. Testing whether this feature works or not was used in the programs running on an 80386 CPU to detect whether the attached FP coprocessor was a 287 or a 387 (because the hardware allowed both; 387 was launched later than 386, so initially a 386 had to be coupled with a 287, if a hardware FPU was needed). | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mschaef 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> I'm curious what the CX-83D87 and Weiteks look like. The Weitek's were memory mapped. (At least those built for x86 machines.). This essentially increased bandwidth by using the address bus as a source for floating point instructions. Was really a very cool idea, although I don't know what the performance realities were when using one. http://www.bitsavers.org/components/weitek/dataSheets/WTL-31... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||