| ▲ | jeff17robbins 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The comparison with AWS Lambda seems to ignore the AWS memory snapshot option called "SnapStart for Python". I'd be interested in seeing the timing comparison extended to include SnapStart. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | killingtime74 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
"SnapStart for Python" costs extra though. If we are paying then you can even have prewarmed Python lambdas with no cold start on AWS (Provisioned Concurrency). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | laurencerowe 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In the linked detailed benchmark results they include Lambda SnapStart which seems to be faster than Cloudflare: > AWS Lambda (No SnapStart) Mean Cold Start: 2.513s Data Points: 1008 > AWS Lambda (SnapStart) Mean Cold Start: 0.855s Data Points: 17 > Google Cloud Run Mean Cold Start: 3.030s Data Points: 394 > Cloudflare Workers Mean Cold Start: 1.004s Data Points: 981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||