| ▲ | eru 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Going on a tangent: I wish in the US more areas of policy would be decided at the state level, and I wish more state government would flip coins to decide on their policy. (Even better, if we can push it down to county level.) The first part is about subsidiarity, which is a good idea anyway. But together this is just a tongue-in-cheek plea for doing more randomised, controlled experiments. (Alas, we can't blind them.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alephnerd 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> I wish in the US more areas of policy would be decided at the state level, and I wish more state government would flip coins to decide on their policy. (Even better, if we can push it down to county level.) The overwhelming majority of policy is decided at the state and local level in the US so long as it's not foreign policy or monetary policy related. Whatever is decided on the Hill has no bearing once administration and implementation comes to play - which is overwhelmingly done by state and local government. This is why the US has become increasingly dysfunctional over the past few years - state and local elections which were previously staid affairs became polarized partisan affairs because turnout is low and the overwhelming majority of decision making roles are elected. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||