| ▲ | CharlieDigital 2 days ago | |
Of course this is not the same as Kafka, but the comment I'm replying to:
Seemed to imply that it's not possible to build a high performance pub/sub system using a simple SQL select. I do not think that is true and it is in fact fairly easy to build a high performance pub/sub system with a simple SQL select. Clearly, this design as proposed is not the same as Kafka. | ||
| ▲ | alexjplant 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
No, I implied that implementing pub/sub with just a select statement is silly because it is. Your implementation accounts for the downfalls of this approach with smart design using a message queue and intelligent locking semantics. Parent of my comment was glib and included none of this. | ||